From: ROPE [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 8:20 AM To: email@example.com Subject: The Way I See HB3399 And Common Core in OK
Having trouble viewing this email? Click here <http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?ca=8ff4a1f9-c6ed-4c58-a6b7-8 54ebabfdc13&c=91d19030-dfae-11e2-8f05-d4ae5292c973&ch=91d512a0-dfae-11e2-8f0 5-d4ae5292c973>
Image removed by sender.
<http://s.rs6.net/t?e=Yje0bvnfLZI&c=1&r=1> Image removed by sender.
<http://s.rs6.net/t?e=Yje0bvnfLZI&c=3&r=1> Image removed by sender.
<http://s.rs6.net/t?e=Yje0bvnfLZI&c=4&r=1> Image removed by sender.
Image removed by sender.
<http://s.rs6.net/t?e=Yje0bvnfLZI&c=5&r=1> Image removed by sender.
Image removed by sender.
<http://myemail.constantcontact.com/The-Way-I-See-HB3399-And-Common-Core-in- OK.html?soid=1105336853070&aid=Yje0bvnfLZI#fblike> Image removed by sender.
Image removed by sender.
Image removed by sender.
Below, I have pasted in most of a blog I wrote Sunday morning. <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001U0lLkWiyo97VUlvgyLHbzNuw4GBPgEdEzUIS7jYQABut h-I7WNR0OEsgC5wMdUNXTGtFsizoDRiEXvhbnQ-ziqLWEMCIIY8ONOr3sPal11ny73OhECDkIk59 jzgvjB40L2bPNbd58D8u1IbTli0vujlK8LLRktFYRnXahVWDrCUdSdPmB-6wMSSjVsFJUEzjFaB0 AadeWUznwsuVn6Hyqu7Wn122Ladvo83GOkaz9qOf3q_i98-Z9qHwkiFZqkJbdwqX0_QYRoHHgLfF 4rsnAw==&c=o12R6Phq6vWGh_are1JxM6e0QfKly_uso6ZddxVyqWMT0AnEjPitsg==&ch=gW1lc LGMgcvEexvJ9bUYggFgJDeNGpu0jzD6WMnBdgj9EK526xc-pQ==> Please use this link to the blog and links corroborating my comments:
When I started trying to fight Common Core years ago, I remember being gullible enough to believe that because Common Core wasn't right, it was stoppable. I remember being looked over, ignored and shut out by parents, legislators, the State Department of Education (SDE) and taxpayers, but I remember believing the truth would somehow win out.
I don't believe that anymore.
I do believe Josh Brecheen and Jason Nelson have worked longer and harder on HB3399 this session than any of their other bills - and that both men genuinely want to stop Common Core and give Oklahoma excellent standards of our own without federal control. I have no doubt about that anymore. I also DON'T DOUBT the following facts:
Brad Henry took State Fiscal Stabilization Funds (SFSF) from the Obama administration and when he did, he began the process of handing over Oklahoma's public education to the federal government. He didn't stop there, though, he continued the process by applying for a Race to the Top (RTT) grant. For every education 'reform' Oklahoma put into LAW, Oklahoma got more 'points' on their RTT grant. Consequently:
* the Common Core State Standards were instituted into law before they were ever even available to read in final form, * the underpinnings of the P20/W Council (Prek-20 years and Workforce) were cemented in place to collect massive amounts of data on public school children without consent of their parents thanks to the changes in FERPA laws under Arne Duncan and the Obama administration * A-F grading system and teacher 'accountability' systems were begun
Once Governor Mary Fallin and Superintendent Barresi took office, it only got worse. As I have said numerous times, these women have spoken out of both sides of their mouths with forked tongues for as long as they have been in office.
Superintendent Barresi has - on innumerable occasions - spoken with great forcefulness against the intrusion of the federal government into education all the while applying for a FEDERAL Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge grant, a No Child Left Behind Waiver and a State Longitudinal Database grant enmeshing Oklahoma in a veritable web of FEDERAL CONTROL all while ceding control of the Department of Education to employees from Achieve (John Kramen - Executive Director of Student Information) by way of the American Diploma Project and former employees of the Jeb Bush Excellence in Education/Chiefs for Change circle.
* Then there's the Common Core testing. Barresi got out of PARCC the organization granted millions of federal funds (from stimulus money) to create the tests associated with the Common Core. She moved, however, to a contract with Measured Progress whose website says, "We assist both the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium and the Partnership to Assess Resdiness for College and Career - the multi-state consortia formed through the Race to the Top initiatve and charged with developing Common Core assessments." So how'd we get out of PARCC again? How'd we think that the Federal Government was just going to throw away all those hard earned ARRA funds (stimulus) they'd plunked down to PARCC and Smarter Balance for creating the tests (the word "assessment" is not 'test' - please look it up). Did we REALLY think our big government superintendent would do that?
* We've all been told by Dr. Baressi and others that the Common Core State Standards are not a vehicle for collecting data. WRONG! Here's a sentence found on the Common Core State Standards website (the website has been newly-redesigned but the information here has stayed the same as the screenshots I took last year for my presentation to the CC Interim Study in October) "The project offers a more fine-grained digital mapping that is needed to fulfill the goals and objectives of the multi-state assessment consortia as well as for other purposes including the digital alignment of instructional materials and professional development resources." I just asked my data-base developer husband who told me that this project will create a map that will allow the CCSS to be reduced to data points that can be linked together in a database. This may not mean much, but when you add the fact that the website goes on to say, "The corestandards.org XML file follows the Common Education Data Standards (CEDS) schema, also used by Schools Interoperatbility Framework Association (SIF)", you're in trouble. The CEDS is the creation that names every conceivable piece of data that can be collected on children in public education so all schools/districts/state/feds can collect individual pieces of data using the same terminology, allowing all schools to "seamlessly" share and understand the same data points. When you add in the fact that these data points are moving along something called the SIF (created by Microsoft) and this SIF is the common track that connects all schools to the OSDE and the OSDE to the Federal Government, you've just discovered that yes, the Common Core State Standards are not only data points on which to create Common Core tests, but also a mechanism for collecting data via the hundreds of programs being developed for use in classrooms today such as that created by eScholar which tracks kids from the moment they enter the school room until...well, we're not sure when the tracking stops!
Governor Fallin has gone so far as to create an Executive Order decrying federal involvement in public education all the while SIGNING OFF on every single federal grant generated at the State Department of Education including the NCLB waiver about which she says, "Oklahoma passed several landmark education reforms last year, and we expect those improvements to our educational system to continue to improve the quality of our schools raise performance levels among students and ultimately lead to a better educated and more highly skilled workforce."
* Then there is her America Works initiative for the NGA where she reinforces the need for Common Core (nationalized) standards in order to prepare students for jobs - not life, but JOBS by saying, "As demand for skilled workers continues to rise, governors are playing an increasingly pivotal role in aligning state's education and training resources with the needs of their growing economies." Yes, Governor Fallin believes in the Communist notion of Human Capital (Governor Mary Fallin Oklahoma schools such as Oklahoma City University are providing the energy industry with the human capital needed to support rapid industry growth).
* In fact, Governor Fallin "...Comes to Common Core's Defense in NGA Speech" just as recently as January 15th of this year!
Does any of this sound like these two women want to REPEAL anything they've either continued from Brad Henry's administration or developed themselves in conjunction with the federal government? It doesn't to me, so let's just follow this to its logical conclusion:
Yes, we might repeal Common Core from law, but I believe our Governor and Superintendent will find a way to continue the process. They HAVE to! Think of all the tentacles these two have let into the state through the federal grants/waiver they have allowed!
1. If Oklahoma goes back to PASS, the state will lose their waiver because PASS is not "college and career ready" (according to prevailing thought). Of course there is absolutely no precedent for losing the waiver - and, since the waiver was based on 'assurances' in the first place, they could be traded out with another set of standards so long as we were being shown to be working on them - but neither Fallin nor Baressi have the gumption to challenge this on the grounds that protecting Oklahoma's children from the feds is best. I don't believe they don't believe that - they may say one thing but they do another. 2. Oklahoma already has a 34.45 MILLION dollar contract with NON-PROFIT Measured Progress (MP) to test Common Core State Standards set for school year 2014-15. If the tests don't align with the standards, we lose the waiver. Plus, no one seems to know if the testing contract can even be broken. Just out of curiosity how can MP be a not for profit and make that much off one testing contract? 3. If the tests aren't ready to go, they can't be used for the school's A-F grade, which is part of the 'accountability' measures in the waiver, so again, you bust the waiver. 4. Eventually, the tests are to be used with the teacher accountability system - also a part of the waiver conditions - so again, we'd bust the waiver. 5. We have to set up a State Longitudinal Database System (SLDS), if we stop that, we lose the waiver, but also may have to send money back to the feds because this was also part of the SFSF grant for which Henry applied and the SLDS grant under Fallin and Baressi.
It appears to me that no matter what, Janet Baressi and Mary Fallin have entangled Oklahoma in such a web of federal intrusion (all the while saying they hate federal intrusion) that it's going to be difficult to stop ANYTHING at this point if we don't remove these women come election time. We can write all the bills we want, but if those in power aren't interested in solving the actual problems created by all the federal government red tape they've created, I don't see anything changing - NOTHING.
As for HB3399, I completely agree with Linda Murphy who listed among her desires:
* keeping PASS in the interim * stretching out the interim from 1 year to 2 (it was originally 2, I actually missed the change apparently) * establish a task force or committee of some kind BEFORE the standards are devised in in order to make the process more transparent (however, if we leave this up to the candidates to tell us what they would do, it could certainly become a campaign issue!) * stop the contract with Measured Progress and go back to the tests given under the CTB/McGraw/Hill contract
(Unfortunately, her two other desires - removing the American Diploma Project (ADP) and ACT testing are not found in HB3399, but existing school law included with the bill language due to the presence of PASS references which were removed - and as such would require a separate bill altogether. Also, until colleges and universities do away with ACT testing as a necessity for admission, I don't see that as viable, sadly, and Janet Baressi employed John Kraman who is from both ADP and Achieve, so again, I think you have to remove our current Superintendent and replace her with someone who is interested in removing Oklahoma from these associations for that to happen.)
Also sadly, I don't see keeping PASS as an option - again because of what we have heard about the process. I think the interim can be stretched and possibly the task force and I would LOVE to see us dump Measured Progress and stop testing over Common Core but I have no idea how likely that actually is - we'll just have to keep pushing the issue.
There are some really great things in HB3399 that never get talked about for some reason. You can find them in my earlier blog with my talking points <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001U0lLkWiyo97VUlvgyLHbzNuw4GBPgEdEzUIS7jYQABut h-I7WNR0OEsgC5wMdUNXfoymjdgdxWy2i8BoIA0FFUDGJm5d4TGl2F6C9HjbHZVRjifR_Fg-yH-1 -UbS2LoO4oHDcn71QaSoGTi0y2dQfCO_FBd5xzPPI_-t4WifgakdUZCLKrFBrXZJqJpzVeKmD6Tf tQKz1L86Uh0KrjO9g7G0wqpCt7ajdewhqQs-RSAWZIIZrmPzfpfMG7NIuCux-I05H6p4MHEQLU6p mN9VOQ==&c=o12R6Phq6vWGh_are1JxM6e0QfKly_uso6ZddxVyqWMT0AnEjPitsg==&ch=gW1lc LGMgcvEexvJ9bUYggFgJDeNGpu0jzD6WMnBdgj9EK526xc-pQ==> , but none the least of these are that it prevents the State School Board (SSB) from 'ceding' authority of state standards to any outside entity - meaning we can't use Common Core (or OAS) in the future because they have a national origin and were created outside our state. In addition TESTS must be designed, owned and controlled by the SSB.
Again, until we decide we want to have political leaders with the political will to extricate Oklahoma from the federal government - not by word but by DEED - we will continue to get the same thing over and over and over. We MUST think on these issues as we go to the ballot box in June and November and we MUST show up there with a well-educated decision or just get used to same ol' same ol' all over again.
Bottom line: If we will be forced to use OAS (Common Core) tests and standards for two years while we create new standards, I won't be able to support the 'repeal' portion of the bill (I like several of the other issues addressed by/in the bill and would hope we could keep the bill alive and move forward with those). There will be little reason to have a "Common Core repeal" bill because the standards will have been so ingrained and imbedded with all the stuff I've already mentioned in two years, if it isn't too late now, it will be by then. At that point, we'll simply have to leave the consequences in the laps of our Governor and State Superintendent a election time.
ADENDUM: After I wrote my blog, Lynn found an (addendum) to our FIRST No Child Left Behind Waiver.
"The Oklahoma State Department of Education is in the process of amending Oklahoma's ESEA flexibility waiver. The documents listed here highlight the contents of this amendment. Some of the major changes include the definition of Full Academic Year (FAY) status and the new Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) calculations. This replaces the NCLB Accountability Workbook that was in place before Oklahoma's request for ESEA Flexibility."
This has been up for public comment. I guess you just have to check the OSDE website each and every day to see what exactly is up for public comment. It looks as though there are a number of calculations the OSDE is asking to change. Gosh, I wonder how much more money could go into the classroom if we weren't spending all the money to make sure we're appropriately kowtowing to the feds?
Restore Oklahoma Public Education
<http://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&m=001tLDW1VEHeMjlmHBf9Jxc0A%3D%3 D&ch=91d512a0-dfae-11e2-8f05-d4ae5292c973&ca=8ff4a1f9-c6ed-4c58-a6b7-854ebab fdc13> Image removed by sender.
<http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=TEM_Promo_209> Image removed by sender.
This email was sent to firstname.lastname@example.org by email@example.com |
ROPE | P.O. Box 334 | Arcadia | OK | 73007